ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Validation of algorithms for identifying people living with HIV in French medico-administrative databases: implications for HIV surveillance.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrench medico-administrative databases (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS) are increasingly used to study the epidemiology of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections. However, algorithms used to target HIV-positive patient populations have not yet been evaluated. This study aimed to validate algorithms for identifying people living with HIV in French medico-administrative databases and thus estimate diagnosed HIV prevalence and incidence.
methodsTwo algorithms were evaluated to detect diagnosed HIV cases. A gold-standard cohort was created by matching clinical data from a hospital data warehouse to the SNDS. The performance of the algorithms was assessed using Bayesian models, then calculated adjusted national HIV prevalence and incidence were estimated on the entire SNDS based on algorithm performance.
resultsFor the prevalently diagnosed HIV population, the algorithms showed high sensitivity and specificity (> 99%). For new diagnoses, the sensitivity was 82–95% with a specificity > 99.9%. The positive predictive values varied substantially among the algorithms. The adjusted 2020 prevalence estimates ranged from 135,448 − 145,704 individuals diagnosed with HIV. For 2017–2023, the algorithms estimated 27,283 − 45,346 new diagnoses, compared to 40,912 from mandatory notifications.
conclusionMedico-administrative data can provide useful automated HIV surveillance, but algorithm performance must be considered when interpreting the results. More sophisticated algorithms may improve the accuracy. These methods could complement existing HIV monitoring systems in France.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.