Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820859›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2026

Assessing the non-inferiority of a 10-day compared with a 14-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy regimen for H. pylori eradication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Azzam Zrineh, Rami Akwan, Muhammad M Elsharkawy, Mostafa Adel T Mahmoud, Hadeel Ayesh, Mazen Momtaz Shehata, Hamza Karmi, Elsayed S Moubarak

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mechanism-matchedFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Azzam ZrinehFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine. azzamzrineh@gmail.com.
Rami AkwanSyrian Private University, Damascus, Syria.
Muhammad M ElsharkawyAlexandria Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mostafa Adel T MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt.
Hadeel AyeshFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Mazen Momtaz ShehataFaculty of Medicine, Modern University for Technology and Information, Cairo, Egypt.
Hamza KarmiFaculty of Medicine, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Elsayed S MoubarakFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelicobacter pylori infection affects approximately 50% of the global population and remains a major cause of peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has emerged as a promising alternative to proton pump inhibitors in H. pylori eradication regimens. Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy offers a simplified treatment approach with potentially high eradication rates. However, the optimal treatment duration remains uncertain, with important implications for patient adherence, adverse events, and antimicrobial resistance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether 10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy is non-inferior to the standard 14-day regimen for H. pylori eradication in adults.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of major medical databases for randomized controlled trials published up to September 27, 2025. The primary outcome was H. pylori eradication rate, with secondary outcomes including adverse events and treatment compliance. Risk differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for primary outcomes, and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for secondary outcomes, using a random-effects model. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool.

resultsSeven randomized controlled trials were identified, of which six trials were included in the quantitative analysis. In the intention-to-treat population (n = 2,587), the pooled risk difference for eradication rate was − 0.03 (95% CI: -0.06 to -0.01, P = 0.008), with the lower confidence interval limit above the prespecified non-inferiority margin of -0.1, demonstrating non-inferiority of the 10-day regimen. Per-protocol analysis (n = 2,358) confirmed these findings with a risk difference of -0.04 (95% CI: -0.06 to -0.01, P = 0.009), also with the lower confidence interval limit above the non-inferiority margin. No significant differences were observed for adverse events (P = 0.67) or treatment compliance (P = 0.88).

conclusions10-day vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy is non-inferior to a 14-day regimen for H. pylori eradication in adults, with comparable safety profiles and compliance rates. While promising, the evidence is confined to Chinese populations, which limits generalizability to other settings. Further research in diverse ethnic groups and geographic regions is warranted to confirm these findings worldwide. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

AmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamidesvonoprazanAmoxicillinDual therapyHelicobacter pyloriMeta-analysisNon-inferioritySystematic reviewTreatment durationVonoprazan

Identifiers

PMID41820859
PMCPMC13094063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.