ArticleAdvances in therapy2026
Budget Impact of Venetoclax for Newly Diagnosed Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Aged ≥ 75 Years or with Comorbidities Precluding Intensive Chemotherapy in the United States.
Article in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVenetoclax plus azacitidine or decitabine is approved in the US for treatment of newly diagnosed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) aged ≥ 75 years or who have comorbidities precluding use of intensive chemotherapy. As novel targeted regimens expand treatment options for AML, this study evaluated the budget impact of adopting venetoclax combinations for this population from a US third-party payer perspective to inform affordability and access at the health plan level.
methodsThe model estimated the 3-year budget impact of adopting venetoclax combinations in a hypothetical US health plan with 1 million members (60% commercial, 40% Medicare). Eligible patients were estimated using public data. Market share projections assumed venetoclax + azacitidine or decitabine captured a 53% and 15% share, respectively, from existing treatments (azacitidine, low-dose cytarabine [LDAC], decitabine, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, glasdegib + LDAC, and ivosidenib + azacitidine). The model considered costs associated with drug acquisition/administration, adverse events, hospitalization, disease monitoring, blood transfusions, and subsequent AML management (2024 USD). Clinical inputs for venetoclax combinations were informed by final VIALE-A and M14-358 data, respectively. Incremental budget impact was calculated as per-member-per-month (PMPM), with one-way sensitivity analyses performed.
resultsIn a 1-million-member health plan, 48 patients were eligible for venetoclax combinations. Annual costs of venetoclax + azacitidine ($258,498) or decitabine ($259,921) were lower than those of the highest-cost comparators, ivosidenib + azacitidine ($477,520) and ivosidenib ($404,869). Drug acquisition costs of adopting venetoclax combinations were offset by lower subsequent AML management costs, resulting in savings of $0.0476 PMPM in years 1-3. Results remained robust in sensitivity analyses. In a 100% Medicare scenario, 117 patients were eligible for venetoclax combinations, with savings of $0.1137 PMPM over years 1-3.
conclusionInclusion of venetoclax combinations for newly diagnosed patients with AML aged ≥ 75 years or with comorbidities precluding intensive chemotherapy reduced the budget impact, providing potential financial benefits for US payers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.