ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Machine Learning Prediction of Vaginal Tissue Tears Using Finite Element Simulations Informed by Planar Biaxial Testing.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVaginal tissue tearing during childbirth is a prevalent injury with potential long-term consequences, yet the mechanical factors influencing tear behavior remain poorly understood due to the difficulty of conducting in vivo studies. This study aims to investigate how tear geometry and fiber orientation influence local stress and strain patterns, and whether machine learning (ML) can accurately predict tissue responses from finite element (FE) simulation data.
methodsPreviously characterized swine vaginal tissue, tested via planar biaxial loading, was used to calibrate the Holzapfel-Gasser-Ogden (HGO) hyperelastic constitutive model. FE simulations were conducted for a range of tear orientations, tear sizes, and fiber alignments to evaluate stress and strain distributions near the tear boundary. Four ML models, linear regression with Stochastic Gradient Descent, Random Forest, Support Vector Regression, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), were trained and evaluated on the FE-generated dataset.
resultsThe HGO-based FE simulations reproduced experimental results with high fidelity, validating the modeling approach. XGBoost achieved the highest predictive accuracy across all mechanical and geometric outputs. Sensitivity analysis via permutation tests revealed that the initial orientation of the elliptical tear was the most influential predictor of high local stress and strain at the tear during extension.
conclusionThis integrated FE-ML approach enables rapid, accurate prediction of vaginal tissue behavior under varied tear conditions without additional simulations or experimental tests. By leveraging synthetic data, it provides a powerful tool for injury risk evaluation and supports clinical decision-making in maternal health, particularly where in vivo studies are limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41820774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.