ReviewOphthalmology and therapy2026
Quadrant-Specific Pain in Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient-reported pain during intravitreal injection (IVI) may vary by injection quadrant and influence adherence to repeated treatments. Hence, this study aimed to quantify whether patient-reported pain differs by IVI quadrant and identify the least-painful approach.
methodsWe searched 13 literature databases on 15 October 2025 for clinical studies reporting patient-reported IVI pain stratified by injection quadrant (superotemporal [ST], superonasal [SN], inferotemporal [IT], inferonasal [IN]). Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized mean differences (MD) in 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) pain across all six pairwise quadrant contrasts. All eligible studies were included for a qualitative review and a meta-analysis. The review was prospectively registered (PROSPERO CRD420251164189).
resultsSeven studies comprising 2048 IVI were included (ST 611, SN 469, IT 556, IN 412). Most injections involved anti-VEGF agents. All injections were performed under topical anesthesia (100%; drops or gel), with no subconjunctival anesthesia reported (0%), and pain was recorded immediately post-procedure using VAS-derived scales. Across all six pairwise contrasts, pooled mean differences between quadrants were small (typically < 1 VAS unit on a 0-10 scale), and all 95% confidence intervals crossed zero. Across quadrant comparisons, pooled pain differences were small and inconsistent; none of the pairwise pooled estimates demonstrated a statistically consistent difference, and between-study heterogeneity was substantial to considerable (I
conclusionsCurrent evidence does not demonstrate a clearly less painful quadrant for intravitreal injections. Estimates varied across studies and heterogeneity was substantial, limiting confidence in any single average quadrant effect. Efforts to minimize IVI-related pain should prioritize optimized anesthesia protocols, communication, and injection technique, while future studies should standardize pain measurement and quadrant allocation to clarify whether subtle quadrant effects exist.
trial registrationPROSPERO registration: CRD420251164189.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.