ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Long COVID and the Challenge of Long-Term Employment: An Ecological, Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods Approach.
Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing work ability and return-to-work in individuals affected by post-COVID: a systematic review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify and contextualize the determinants of long-term employment, health, and financial outcomes among individuals affected by Long COVID.
methodsSequential explanatory mixed-methods study design guided by the social-ecological model. Adults with Long COVID who were employed before infection and returned to work during the three-year follow-up were recruited through in-person and virtual outpatient venues: ResearchMatch, a Long COVID clinic, and a peer support group affiliated with a medical center. Participants completed validated surveys assessing factors influencing sustained employment. Stratified semi-structured interviews were then conducted to explore how these factors shaped sustained employment. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods, while qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis.
resultsAmong 79 participants who returned to work, 58% (n = 46) remained employed after a mean follow-up of 1,077 days. Those still employed reported reduced capacity and persistent uncertainty. Those no longer employed experienced worse physical health (p < 0.002), greater comorbidity burden (p = 0.01), more environmental barriers (p = 0.02), and increased financial hardship (p = 0.03). Qualitative analyses identified nonlinear return-to-work trajectories shaped by fluctuating and often invisible symptoms, alongside multilevel themes influencing employment sustainability, including misalignment between functional capacity and job demands, challenges obtaining workplace accommodations, stigma, limited policies, and labor market barriers.
conclusionsEmployment sustainability among individuals with Long COVID is shaped by complex, multilevel barriers, with job loss further worsening health and financial hardship. Investment in comprehensive Long COVID care, including multidisciplinary clinical services, vocational rehabilitation, clinician education, public awareness initiatives, employer training, and policy reform, is critical to support long-term recovery and employment sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.