ArticleObesity surgery2026
30-day Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Patients Over 75: Insights from the MBSAQIP Database.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBariatric surgery is increasingly utilized in elderly populations as a treatment for morbid obesity, with demonstrated benefits in weight loss and comorbidity resolution. However, data on the safety and efficacy of these procedures in super-elderly patients remain limited, particularly regarding different types of surgical procedures.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the incidence and nature of 30-day postoperative complications in patients aged 75 and older undergoing primary bariatric surgery as well as comparing the outcomes between SG and RYGB procedures.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed super-elderly patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery between 2015 and 2023. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were extracted from the MBSAQIP database. Patients were categorized into SG and RYGB groups, and 30-day outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, and specific complications, were assessed and compared.
resultsA total of 2,539 patients (median age: 76 years, 64.8% women) were included. SG was the most commonly performed procedure (75%), followed by RYGB (21.2%). Within 30 days postoperative complications occurred in 10.4% of patients, with severe complications in 6.0%. Mortality was low (0.3%). SG demonstrated significantly lower rates of overall (8.7% vs. 15.8%) and severe complications (4.7% vs. 10.2%) compared to RYGB. Specific complications, including deep surgical site infections, bowel obstruction, and septic shock, were more prevalent in the RYGB group. Both groups had a median hospital stay of one day.
conclusionBariatric surgery in super-elderly patients is associated with low morbidity and mortality rates within 30 days when appropriately optimized. SG, due to its lower 30-day complication rates, may be the preferred option for patients with higher surgical risk. These findings underscore the importance of individualized risk assessment and postoperative care in this high-risk population. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and refine surgical protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41820713What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.