ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2026
What is the role of Intramarrow penetration in managing intrabony defects-A Systematic Review.
Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramarrow Penetration (IMP) has recently gained attention for its potential to enhance periodontal healing with regenerative approaches for osseous deformities such as intrabony defects. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effect of IMP in enhancing periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects when used in conjunction with or without the use of biomaterials. A comprehensive search was performed across databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Lilacs, and Google Scholar. Studies were selected based on the inclusion of clinical outcomes such as probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and bone fill following the application of IMP with Open Flap debridement (OFD) with or without biomaterials. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Initial search yielded 194 studies which eventually resulting in five eligible studies for inclusion in the review. Four of the five included studies reported that IMP significantly improved clinical and radiographic outcomes, including reduced PPD, increased CAL, and enhanced bone fill. IMP can be a potential adjunct to OFD for periodontal regeneration in intrabony defects, offering advantages such as improved healing and enhanced bone regeneration. However, as the quality of evidence is very low a definitive clinical recommendation cannot be made. Further well-designed multicentre studies are necessary to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.