ArticleDiscover nano2026
Size and shape dependent cohesive energy and melting temperature in semiconducting nanomaterials.
Article in Discover nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting thermophysical properties at the nanoscale remains challenging due to the lack of a unified model that simultaneously accounts for key factors such as atomic packing of the crystal lattice, surface-bond relaxation effects, and particle shape, along with the particle size, leading to limited analytical accuracy in existing thermodynamic models. Thus, this work introduces a unified thermodynamic model that explicitly incorporates the combined effects of two key factors-the atomic packing factor (µ) and the shape factor (α) of nanoparticles-along with size. These factors are essential for accurately describing the thermophysical properties of semiconductor nanomaterials. The model is applied to InSb, ZnSe, CdS, and CdSe semiconductor nanomaterials with various shapes, including nanowire, spherical, octahedral, hexahedral, and tetrahedral. A significant finding is the strong size-dependent decrease in cohesive energy and melting temperature, with noticeable deviations seen below 5 nm. Shape effects become crucial at this scale. Nanowires show smaller reductions in both cohesive energy and melting temperature compared to tetrahedral nanoparticles of similar size, indicating reduced surface vibrational relaxation. In comparison to the universal liquid drop model, which uses a fixed shape factor (α = 2/3), the current model aligns more closely with theoretical data. These results suggest thermodynamic stability for nanowire formation in the size range of less than 5 nm, and also highlight the importance of the µ-α coupling and surface vibrational effects in accurately defining thermophysical properties at the nanoscale. The proposed model lays a solid foundation for the predictive design of semiconductor nanomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.