Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820676›Full record

ReviewArchives of virology2026

Insect cypoviruses: advances in structural characterization, evolutionary genomics, and host interaction dynamics.

Roja Gnanasekaran, Gangavarapu Subrahmanyam, Katsuhiko Ito, Dsr Hiranmayi, Siripuk Suraporn, Luc Swevers, Joachim R de Miranda, Himanshu Dubey, Rajal Debnath, Pawan Shukla and 5 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Roja GnanasekaranCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India.
Gangavarapu SubrahmanyamCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India. subrahmanyamg.csb@nic.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0297-5675
Katsuhiko ItoDepartment of Science of Biological Production, Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu, Tokyo, 183-8509, Japan.
Dsr HiranmayiCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India.
Siripuk SurapornDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantharawichai District, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand.
Luc SweversInstitute of Biosciences and Applications, National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos, Athens, 15341, Greece.
Joachim R de MirandaDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0335-0386
Himanshu DubeyCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India.
Rajal DebnathCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India.
Pawan ShuklaCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India.
K P ArunkumarCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India.
Liang JiangBiological Science Research Center, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-3237
Qingyou XiaBiological Science Research Center, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400716, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9263-2886
Sanman SamovaGujarat Biotechnology Research Centre, Department of Science & Technology, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
S Manthira MoorthyCSB-Institute for Seri-biotechnological Research, Central Silk Board, Ministry of Textiles, Govt. of India, Kodathi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560035, India.

Funding

central silk board ARP08007MI
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cypoviruses are insect-specific, double-stranded RNA viruses belonging to the genus Cypovirus within the family Spinareoviridae. Cypoviruses primarily infect insects of the orders Lepidoptera, Diptera, and Hymenoptera. These viruses replicate in midgut epithelial cells, forming polyhedrin-based occlusion bodies. Cypovirus genomes typically consist of 10-16 linear double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) segments that encodes distinct viral proteins; however, the number of genomic segments may vary among species. Each genomic segment encodes a functionally specialized distinct viral protein, with high intra-species conservation but notable divergence between species, reflecting genomic plasticity and evolutionary divergence. This review presents a comprehensive comparative genomic analysis of representative Cypovirus species, focusing on segment-wise assignments. Segment 1 universally encodes the major capsid protein, while segment 2 encodes the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) and segment 3 encodes the minor capsid protein. Segments 4 and 5 typically encode enzymes with methyltransferase and guanylyl transferase, which are essential for RNA capping. Segments 6 to 8 encodes for other structural or accessory proteins. Segment 9 frequently encodes a non-structural protein and segment 10 consistently encodes structural polyhedrin protein. Conserved protein domains and sequence motifs are identified across cypovirus genomic segments. Analysis of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitutions (Ka/Ks ratios) reveals evidence of both purifying and positive selection in viral genomic segments. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrates lineage diversification and species-specific clustering. Genotypic and phenotypic variability among viral strains correlates with host insect species, co-infection and geographic isolation, whereas functional convergence in protein roles is observed across species. This study consolidates electrophoretic migration patterns and genomic demarcation criteria for Cypovirus species into a practical reference framework that enables rapid species identification without the need for complete genome sequencing. The current review provides structural, genomic, and evolutionary insights that collectively advance the current understanding of cypovirus biology and diversity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ViralInsectaReoviridaeAnimalsGenomicsHost-Pathogen InteractionsPhylogenyViral ProteinsViral Proteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.