Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820673›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2026

A clinical environment simulator for dynamic AI evaluation.

Luyang Luo, Sung Eun Kim, Xiaoman Zhang, Julius M Kernbach, Roshan Kenia, Julian N Acosta, Larry A Nathanson, Adrian D Haimovich, Adam Rodman, Ethan Goh and 10 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Luyang Luo *Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7485-4151
Sung Eun Kim *Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1954-9875
Xiaoman ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7696-9366
Julius M KernbachDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roshan KeniaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Julian N AcostaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Larry A NathansonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2297-1495
Adrian D HaimovichDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Adam RodmanDivision of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Ethan GohStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7491-4257
Jonathan H ChenStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-8740
Nigam H ShahStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9385-7158
David A KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0151-5121
James ZouDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-4764
Faisal MahmoodMass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7587-1562
Jakob Nikolas KatherDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-5348
Matthew LungrenMicrosoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA.
Vivek NatarajanGoogle Research, Mountain View, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7849-2074
Eric J TopolScripps Research Translational Institute, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1478-4729
Pranav RajpurkarDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. pranav_rajpurkar@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8030-3727

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical evaluation of large language models (LLMs) currently relies on static datasets and isolated scenarios that fail to capture the cascading effects of healthcare decisions. We propose the Clinical Environment Simulator (CES), a framework that evaluates clinical LLMs within digital hospital environments where every decision dynamically alters future states. The CES would use a parallel simulation architecture: a 'hospital engine' that tracks bed availability, staff workloads and equipment status in real time, and a 'patient engine' that simulates disease progression and treatment responses based on LLM interventions. Unlike current benchmarks, the CES framework requires clinical LLMs to execute decisions through realistic electronic health record interfaces, while managing trade-offs between individual patient optimization and system-wide efficiency. The CES enables three critical evaluations absent from current benchmarks: temporal reasoning under evolving constraints, where delayed diagnostics can lead to patient deterioration; resource-aware decision-making, where aggressive workups for one patient may exhaust capacity needed by others; and operational resilience, through adversarial testing with simultaneous emergencies and system failures. By scoring LLM performance on both clinical outcomes and operational metrics, the CES represents a shift toward evaluating clinical LLMs as a dynamic and integrated component of healthcare delivery systems.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationDigital HealthElectronic Health RecordsHumansIntelligent SystemsLarge Language Models

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.