ArticleScientific reports2026
Field-based evaluation of trunk strength using a novel in-chair assessment system in elite wheelchair athletes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trunk strength is essential for performance in wheelchair-based sports, yet assessment under sport-specific conditions is challenging. The athlete and their sport wheelchair act as a unit, so meaningful assessment should occur in the wheelchair itself. We developed a mobile device that measures isometric trunk flexion, extension, and lateral flexion directly in the athlete’s own sport wheelchair. We first examined test-retest reliability in both able-bodied participants and elite wheelchair basketball (WB) players. Both cohorts showed high day-to-day consistency (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.85–0.97; coefficient of variation, < 10%). We then demonstrated that trunk forces measured distinguish between established WB functional classes 1.0 (high impairment) – 4,5 (low impairment). Higher classified groups produced significantly greater forces, with a strong positive correlation between classification and force (r = 0.76–0.87). Next, classification-specific reference values were generated and compared with measures from able-bodied participants. Lower classified athletes (1.0-3.5) produced approximately 56% less trunk force than able-bodied participants, whereas players in the highest classification (4.0-4.5) demonstrated comparable or up to 31% higher force in trunk flexion. These findings support the device as a reliable, field-based method to quantify trunk strength in athletes’ own wheelchairs and show that it can differentiate functional classes, enabling its application in performance testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.