Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820611›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Authors' Response to Comment on "When Genes Meet Gels: Computational Immunogenetics of Dermal Fillers and Stratified Risk of Immune and Fibrotic Reactions Across Compositions and Genotypes".

Eqram Rahman, William Richard Webb

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eqram RahmanResearch and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London, WC2H 9JQ, UK. Eqram.rahman@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8443-8338
William Richard WebbResearch and Innovation Hub, Innovation Aesthetics, London, WC2H 9JQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We thank the correspondents for their thoughtful commentary on our recently published computational framework evaluating immune and fibrotic risk associated with dermal filler materials. We clarify that the proposed model was intentionally designed to generate relative, rank-based risk indices rather than absolute clinical event probabilities, a distinction explicitly acknowledged in the original manuscript. Key limitations, including the absence of real-world outcome validation and the exclusion of procedural and time-dependent clinical variables, were clearly stated and reflect current constraints in available denominator-level and patient-specific data. The framework aims to isolate the contribution of filler physicochemical properties and host genetic susceptibility within a controlled, reproducible environment. We view this work as hypothesis-generating and foundational, providing an evidence-organized structure upon which future clinically calibrated and multimodal models may be built.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Cosmetic TechniquesDermal FillersSkin AgingFemaleFibrosisGelsGenotypeHumansImmunogeneticsRisk AssessmentDermal FillersGelsBiostimulatory fillersCalcium hydroxylapatiteComputational modelingDermal fillersGenetic susceptibilityHyaluronic acidImmunogenicityPoly-L-lactic acidRheology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.