ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Estimating bloodstain age using headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) and machine learning.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GC-MS-based volatolomics and machine learning for predicting bloodstain time since deposition.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bloodstain age, or the time since deposition (TSD), is crucial for reconstructing event timelines in forensic investigations. While traditional bloodstain analysis has limitations in reliability and methodology, Headspace-Gas Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) and machine learning (ML) provide a rapid, reliable, objective, and non-destructive solution. This study combined HS-GC-IMS with ML to systematically investigate the dynamic changes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during the early, middle, and late stages of bloodstain aging. Blood samples from 10 healthy volunteers were analyzed at 8 specific time points spanning 0 h to 70 days. HS-GC-IMS was performed to profile VOC, while multiple ML algorithms were applied to identify key VOC markers. Among 52 VOCs detected, we found specific changes in 22 key biomarkers—including ketones, aldehydes, and terpenes—that correlated with the early (decrease in ketone), middle (emergence of terpenes and aromatic hydrocarbons), and late (dominance of aldehydes and ketones) stages of bloodstain aging. Further OPLS-DA and Pearson correlation analysis identified five independent metabolites for estimating bloodstain age: Propanal, 2-Methoxy-3-methylpyrazine, Benzaldehyde, Ethyl Acetate, and 2,3-Pentanedione. Subsequent ML models (Random Forest, Naive Bayes, and Neural Network) exhibited strong classification performance, enabling effective discrimination of bloodstain age. The integrated HS-GC-IMS and ML approach provides a highly sensitive, rapid, and reliable way to screen for and estimate bloodstain age at crime scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41820607What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.