Observational studyInternational orthopaedics2026
Robotic-assisted reverse shoulder arthroplasty achieves operative time neutrality after an initial learning period.
Observational study in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Late efficiency gains in robotic-assisted reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an updated learning curve analysis of the first 100 cases.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic assistance reduces operative time variability in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon study.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Zone-specific acromial cortical thickening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.International orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeRobotic assistance has recently been introduced for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with the goal of improving the accuracy and consistency of implant positioning, but the additional workflow steps required for its use may prolong operative time. Whether operative time returns to a conventional benchmark after an initial learning period remains uncertain. This study sought to characterize the operative time learning curve for robotic-assisted RSA using the Mako robotic system (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI).
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of 30 consecutive elective robotic-assisted primary RSA cases performed by a single shoulder fellowship-trained surgeon using the Mako robotic system at an academic ambulatory surgery centre between October 2025 and February 2026. The operative time benchmark was defined a priori as all consecutive conventional primary RSA cases performed at the same surgery centre from its opening in July 2025 through October 2025 (n = 16). Operative time was defined as incision start to incision closure. Learning curve behaviour among robotic cases was assessed using linear regression of operative time on sequential robotic case number. Robotic cases were also grouped into three prespecified 10-case blocks (1-10, 11-20, 21-30).
resultsMean operative time for conventional RSA was 74.9 min (95% CI, 67.3-82.5; range, 55-105). Across robotic-assisted cases, mean operative time was 88.6 min (95% CI, 79.8-97.4; range, 55-170). Operative time decreased with increasing robotic experience (- 1.85 min per case; p = 0.00010; R
conclusionIn a single-surgeon ambulatory surgery centre series, robotic-assisted RSA showed a clear learning curve and achieved operative time neutrality relative to conventional RSA after approximately two dozen cases. These findings support the feasibility of integrating robotic workflows into RSA without a persistent operative time penalty after early adoption, and provide practical expectations for surgeons and institutions planning implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41820603What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.