ArticleScientific reports2026
Variability analysis of a low-cost paper dipstick nucleic acid extraction method for wastewater surveillance using gage repeatability and reproducibility.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial concentration remains a key challenge in developing low-cost, point-of-use wastewater monitoring assays for pandemic preparedness, primarily due to sample heterogeneity and low pathogen load. Paper dipstick-based methods are promising for simplified and low-cost RNA capture and isolation from sub-milliliter sample volumes. However, given the manual nature of the method, variability is a major concern. To evaluate variability introduced by the method type, operator handling, and wastewater samples, we performed a multi-operator two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 'evaluating the measurement process' (EMP) gage repeatability & reproducibility (gage R&R) study. Two-way ANOVA was used to determine whether differences in Ct values across samples, operators, and their interaction were statistically significant. To further assess the source of variation and quantify the repeatability and reproducibility of the assay, a comprehensive EMP gage R&R analysis was conducted. We detected pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) and bacteriophage Phi6 in wastewater samples collected from a sewage pumping station at IIT Bombay campus. PMMoV is abundant in human feces, and a reliable control for normalizing pathogen loads in wastewater by population size, while Phi6 spiked in the wastewater samples is a common surrogate for enveloped viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. Our study demonstrates that dipstick method detected changes in PMMoV load associated with change in the population density due to the campus summer break with the total variation lower than the acceptable gage R&R limit of 30%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.