Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820551›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Temporal synchrony and spatial similarity of interbrain subnetworks predict dyadic social interaction.

Yuqin Li, Senqi Li, Yanggong Li, Xiaoya Pang, Chanlin Yi, Lin Jiang, Dezhong Yao, Wei Wu, Fali Li, Peng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuqin LiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Senqi LiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yanggong LiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Xiaoya PangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Chanlin YiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Lin JiangThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Dezhong YaoThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-879X
Wei WuDepartment of Neurology, Songjiang Hospital and Songjiang Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. weiwuneuro@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3938-8359
Fali LiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. fali.li@uestc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-4591
Peng XuThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, School of Life Science and Technology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. xupeng@uestc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6198-8195

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 82372084National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) W2411084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human social behaviors involve complex interactions between individuals, and understanding how interbrain neural activity reflects and predicts these interactions is critical for advancing social cognitive neuroscience. While electroencephalography (EEG) hyperscanning has been widely used to explore interpersonal neural dynamics, most studies focus on pairwise regional coupling, overlooking the brain's intrinsic network-level organization. Here, we propose a spatiotemporal network analysis framework that combines Bayesian non-negative matrix factorization with EEG source imaging to identify interpretable subnetworks with spatiotemporal information. Applying this framework to dyadic EEG datasets from interactive decision-making tasks identifies eight task-relevant subnetworks, including the default mode network (DMN), somatosensory-motor network (SMN), and visual network (VN). Effective interpersonal coordination was associated with enhanced network-level time-domain interbrain synchrony and spatial-domain inter-subject similarity, and the fusion of these metrics reliably predicted interactive behaviors. Notably, synchrony and similarity involving DMN, VN, and SMN emerge as robust predictors of interactive behaviors, with spatiotemporal coupling most prominent within these subnetworks. These findings reveal spatiotemporal network signatures underlying interpersonal neural synchronization and demonstrate the importance of distributed subnetworks and their temporal and spatial alignment in achieving effective social interactions. This framework provides a useful computational tool for probing the neurobiological basis of social behaviors.

Indexed as

BrainNerve NetSocial InteractionBayes TheoremBrain MappingElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID41820551
PMCPMC13125503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.