ArticleScientific reports2026
Achieving precise chip control for high-end manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In high-end manufacturing, where precision and automation are strictly required, chip control presents an incredibly daunting challenge during the machining process. In this paper, a novel chip control method called grooves induced chip-breaking (GICB) is comprehensively investigated. The core concept of GICB is to achieve spontaneous chip-breaking through the pre-processed micro grooves (PPMG) on the workpiece surface. To understand the underlying chip-breaking mechanisms, PPMG with identical geometric shapes are fabricated on the surface of a 316 L stainless steel workpiece using laser ablation. A cutting experiment is then conducted, where the cutting depth (d) and feed rate (f) are varied. Experimental observations reveal that, apart from enabling controllable chip-breaking, the GICB method can also enhance the quality of the machined surface. Specifically, the surface roughness (Ra) is reduced by up to 26.6%. Further in-depth analyses indicate that the primary cause of this improvement is the reduced fluctuation of the thrust force. With the assistance of PPMG, the chips produced under controlled periodic fracture exhibit similar lengths and curvatures. Benefiting from that, chip agglomeration and entanglement are effectively avoided. In addition, the fluctuation of cutting force is greatly reduced, which in turn improves the machined surface quality. The practical significance of this study is twofold. Firstly, a high-performance chip control method with significant potential applications is systematically explored. Secondly, for the first time, the crucial relationship between chip control and machined surface quality is experimentally verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.