Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820490›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine-learning prediction and risk stratification of 12-month cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease using routine clinical and MRI data.

Yinghui Geng, Huijun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yinghui GengSchool of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China.
Huijun ZhangJinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, China. 13904069606@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early identification of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) who will experience near-term cognitive decline can support trial enrichment and risk-stratified follow-up. Using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), we developed two prognostic models for 12-month Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) decrease (≥ 3 points): (i) a clinical logistic-regression model and (ii) a random-forest model combining clinical variables with MRI-derived volumetric measures. In 306 participants with baseline AD and complete 12-month MMSE (mean age 74.8 years; baseline MMSE 23.1), 131 (42.8%) declined. Five-fold stratified cross-validation with within-fold preprocessing and imputation was used for internal validation. The clinical model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.755, while the random-forest model achieved an AUC of 0.773 and provided higher net benefit across threshold probabilities of 0.20-0.80 in decision-curve analysis. Risk stratification using pre-specified cut-offs (< 0.25, 0.25-0.50, ≥ 0.50) yielded monotonic observed decline rates (13.2%, 35.3%, 67.2%). These findings suggest that a transparent two-model framework based on ADNI data provides moderate prognostic accuracy and clinically interpretable three-tier risk stratification; however, external validation and local recalibration are required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRisk AssessmentAlzheimer’s diseasemachine learningMMSErandom forestrisk stratificationstructural MRI

Identifiers

PMID41820490
PMCPMC13076664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.