ArticleScientific reports2026
Geomorphological changes of natural and engineered vegetated foredunes since completion of Kustwerk Katwijk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For centuries, vegetation has been utilized to enhance dune stability and provide coastal protection. Marram grass (Calamagrostis arenaria) is the most commonly transplanted species on engineered coastal dunes in the Netherlands. However, the geomorphic behavior of engineered foredunes relative to neighboring natural foredunes remains unknown. This study utilizes historical airborne laser surveys, multispectral satellite data, and 2023 field surveys to compare the spatial and temporal patterns of sand accretion and vegetation health of the dike-in-dune in Katwijk, NL, with those of the southern neighboring Berkheide from 2015 to 2023. Results show that average annual sand accretion at the Berkheide foredune was about 1.5 times as much as at the dike-in-dune. Average annual increases in vegetation health, as represented by normalized difference vegetation indices, are roughly equal and less than 0.1 at both the dike-in-dune and Berkheide foredunes. This study observed a generally positive correlation between average annual accretion and vegetation health for each foredune. However, in areas of permanent and temporary beach structures, the Berkheide dune appeared to be the most adversely impacted. This information suggests that the foredunes are growing similarly-although the dike-in-dune is engineered-which is promising for urban coastal communities with coastlines visible leeward.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.