Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820439›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An intelligent computational framework combining neural networks with complex Pythagorean fuzzy FUCA for airspace capacity evaluation and traffic forecasting.

Dan Huo, Shengjie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan HuoAir Traffic Control and Navigation School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an, 710000, Shaanxi, China.
Shengjie ZhangThe 54th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation, Xi'an, 710000, Shaanxi, China. zsj754272317@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contemporary aviation system demands intelligent airspace capacity assessment and traffic prediction, which are essential towards maximizing operational efficiency, safety, and strategic planning. But there are few studies that combine predictive learning with complex fuzzy decision-making, and all three, which are nonlinear traffic dynamics, complex-valued expert uncertainty, and complex decision-making. To overcome uncertainty, vagueness, and complex expertise evaluations that are part of airspace management, this paper suggests a new hybrid framework that integrates both neural networks and the Complex Pythagorean Fuzzy Faire Un Choix Adequat (CPyF-FUCA) multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) model. A case study of a number of decision-makers, fifteen alternatives, and seven criteria of evaluation is conducted in order to demonstrate the practicability of the proposed methodology. In contrast to the current CPyF-based and traditional methods of MCDM, the suggested model combines neural network-based traffic prediction with CPyF-FUCA ranking of intelligent airspace consideration. The CPyF-FUCA method works well in the synthesis of expert views, fuzzy and finer-grained details of interactions, and gives some credible and explainable rankings. The sensitivity analysis and comparison analysis indicate that the proposed technique is stronger, more selective, and more reliable compared to the existing techniques based on CPyF and classical MCDM. The results could be invaluable to the air traffic officials and managers, as they will have the ability to maximize capacity, forecast traffic, and make strategic decisions. This paper is a pioneering hybrid implementation of neural networks and CPyF-FUCA in the airspace capacity assessment and traffic prediction, and provides a versatile and scalable intelligent airspace management instrument during unpredictable circumstances.

Indexed as

Airspace capacity evaluationAir traffic forecastingComplex Pythagorean fuzzy setsDecision-makingFUCA methodNeural networks

Identifiers

PMID41820439
PMCPMC13106684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.