ArticleScientific reports2026
Not all task-unrelated thoughts (TUT) are created equal - TUT characteristics as predictors of affective states and heart-rate variability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Task-Unrelated Thoughts (TUT) are a prevalent transdiagnostic phenomenon, robustly associated with both adaptive and maladaptive outcomes. However, it is still not clear which factors determine the maladaptive outcomes of TUT. In this study, we focused on analysing the role of a wide spectrum of TUT characteristics in everyday functioning, specifically their associations with momentary affective states, depressive symptoms, heart rate variability, and sleep quality. Forty-seven participants took part in a seven-day ecological momentary protocol, completing momentary and daily questionnaires alongside continuous ECG monitoring. Additionally, trait-level measures of mind-wandering, repetitive negative thinking, and depressive and anxiety symptoms were collected using self-report questionnaires. The results show that TUT Emotional Appraisal—especially perceived burden and thought valence—were significant predictors of affective momentary outcomes. In contrast, perceived usefulness of TUT significantly predicted depressive symptoms at the daily level. Part of the associations between TUT characteristics and outcomes was moderated by individual differences, such as tendency to engage in mind-wandering or repetitive negative thinking, as well as trait-level depressive and anxiety symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.