ArticleScientific reports2026
Femoral finite element analysis of a novel cementless revision total knee arthroplasty system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA) is a highly complex procedure challenged by bone defects and compromised biomechanical stability, which may threaten implant fixation and long-term survivorship. This study aimed to introduce a novel cementless RTKA system and evaluate the resulting femoral initial stability. A novel cementless femoral RTKA system based on metaphyseal and biological fixation, comprising a femoral condyle component, metaphyseal cone, and optional intramedullary stems and metal augments, was evaluated using finite element analysis. The initial stability of the system was assessed in a CT-based femoral model under conditions with or without bone defects, at different defect locations, and with or without the use of intramedullary stems and metal augments. Finite element analysis demonstrated that, regardless of the presence of femoral bone defects, the system exhibited favorable interface micromotion and femoral stress distribution, indicating acceptable initial femoral stability. Intramedullary stems reduced micromotion but decreased the proportion of stress within the reference range, whereas metal augments produced only limited numerical improvement without being essential for initial stability. Within the investigated finite element model, the novel cementless RTKA system achieved acceptable initial femoral mechanical stability, even in the presence of femoral bone defects. Adequate initial stability could be obtained through metaphyseal fixation alone, while the additional use of intramedullary stems or metal augments provided limited incremental benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.