ArticleScientific reports2026
Epidemiology and genetic evolution of Anaplasma species in rodents from southeastern China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiological Survey of Tick-Borne Zoonotic Pathogens in Questing Ticks from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaplasma species are globally distributed and pose significant public health threats as zoonotic pathogens. However, the epidemiological characteristics and genetic diversity of Anaplasma in rodents from Fujian Province, southeastern China, remain poorly understood. From 2015 to 2024, we systematically collected 966 rodents across 22 counties and cities in Fujian. Screening was performed using real-time PCR and nested PCR targeting the groEL and 16S rRNA genes. Positive samples were subjected to sequencing, followed by phylogenetic analysis (MEGA11) and haplotype network construction (PopART). The overall infection rate of Anaplasma was 4.35% (42/966), and all positive samples were identified as Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Infection rates showed significant differences among rodent species, cities, habitat types, and sampling years (P < 0.05). Haplotype network analysis indicated that H1 was the dominant haplotype. This study confirms the circulation of A. phagocytophilum in rodents in Fujian, reveals its association with rodent age, seasonal and habitat factors, and underscores the necessity for enhanced ongoing surveillance and control of rodent-borne Anaplasma in this region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.