ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Artificial intelligence assisted multi-model pathological diagnosis of breast cancer based on multispectral autofluorescence images.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction and application of mammary and breast cancer organoids.Cell insight · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virtual staining technology offers a promising solution to overcome the time-consuming and sample-consumption nature of conventional histochemical staining in breast cancer pathology. This study presents a novel framework integrating multispectral autofluorescence imaging with an optimized deep learning architecture to generate high-fidelity, label-free, hematoxylin and eosin-equivalent images. We constructed a multimodal database containing clinical specimens, mouse models, and organoid co-cultures. By enhancing CycleGAN with saliency and global feature consistency losses, multispectral autofluorescence imaging-to-H&E virtual staining performance was significantly improved. This framework learns from unpaired datasets, eliminating the need for pixel-level registration. In blinded evaluations by five board-certified pathologists, 82.2% of virtual staining images achieved clinical scores comparable to conventional staining, with no statistical differences in key diagnostic indices. Moreover, this approach is non-destructive-the same tissue section remains intact for subsequent assays such as single-nucleus RNA sequencing or spatial transcriptomics, maximizing the utility of precious biopsy samples. In summary, this robust framework enables the rapid, non-destructive generation of diagnostic-grade breast cancer pathological images, making it a potential tool for clinical diagnostics and mechanistic studies across diverse biological systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.