ArticleNature communications2026
The evolutionary consequences of behavioural plasticity.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A locus coeruleus-centric framework for novelty, salience, and gamma oscillations: implications for neurostimulation, aging, and disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
When environments change and phenotypes become suboptimal, organisms often mitigate the costs of maladaptation with behavioural adjustments. Although this "buffering" of natural selection is widespread, its evolutionary consequences are poorly understood. Here, I use evolutionary simulations to explore how behavioural plasticity shapes the tempo and mode of adaptive evolution. My results indicate that this fast-acting form of plasticity enhances persistence under suboptimal conditions and facilitates the accumulation of genetic variation within populations. Over short timescales, or when opportunities for niche expansion are limited, the combined action of these effects leads to slower evolution of morphology and physiology. Over longer timescales, or when ecological opportunities abound, it can instead lead to a "Goldilocks" pattern, where evolution is fastest in moderately plastic lineages, whose medium buffering capacity enables persistence in suboptimal conditions without severely constraining subsequent optimizing selection. These findings expose key differences in scope and mechanism relative to other forms of phenotypic plasticity and suggest that behavioural plasticity may more broadly influence the evolutionary trajectories of individual lineages. More generally, they help clarify our understanding of how short-term flexibility shapes long-term adaptation and underscore the need to reassess current risk-assessment frameworks that equate slower evolutionary rates with greater vulnerability to environmental change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.