ArticleNature communications2026
Exon inclusion signatures enable accurate estimation of splicing factor activity.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stratified signaling network remodeling of kinase-transcription factors' interactions in Parkinson's disease.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Using single-cell perturbation screens to decode the regulatory architecture of splicing factor programs.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Splicing factors control exon inclusion in messenger RNAs, shaping transcriptome and proteome diversity. Their catalytic activity is regulated by multiple layers, making single-omic measurements on their own fall short in identifying which splicing factors underlie a phenotype. Here, we posit that splicing factor activity, defined as a splicing factor's ability to modulate exon inclusion, can be estimated from changes in exon inclusion signatures. To test this hypothesis, we benchmark methods for constructing splicing factor→exon networks and estimating splicing factor activity. We find that combining RNA-seq perturbation-based networks with VIPER (Virtual Inference of Protein Activity by Enriched Regulon analysis) accurately captures splicing factor activity as modulated by multiple regulatory layers. This approach integrates splicing factor regulation into a single score derived solely from exon inclusion signatures, allowing functional interpretation of heterogeneous conditions. As a proof of concept, we identify recurrent cancer splicing programs, revealing associations with oncogenic- and tumor suppressor-like splicing factors missed by conventional methods. These programs correlate with patient survival and key cancer hallmarks: initiation, proliferation, and immune evasion. Altogether, we show splicing factor activity can be accurately estimated from exon inclusion changes, enabling comprehensive analyses of splicing regulation with minimal data requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.