Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820236›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026

Impact of Shooting Distance on Oculomotor Strategy in Basketball Shooting.

Alessandro Piras

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alessandro PirasDepartment for Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-0116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the role of eye movements during basketball shooting from various distances. Fourteen male basketball players, equipped with an eye tracker and an inertial sensor, performed 40 shots on a basketball court, divided into free throws and 3-point shots. The results indicated that there were more correct responses than incorrect ones for shots taken from the free-throw line, whereas the number of correct and incorrect shots was equal for three-point attempts. Participants showed different visual strategies depending on the shooting condition. During the three-point shot, they exhibited more saccades, with greater peak velocity and amplitude compared to the free-throw condition. Additionally, participants took almost 800 milliseconds less to complete the three-point shot than the free-throw, as there were no spatial-temporal constraints. In conclusion, the high amplitude and peak velocity of the eye movements, along with the reduced time spent preparing for the shot, may have led to more errors in three-point shots compared to free throws. These findings suggest the need to identify and develop training exercises that effectively refine a shooter's control over release velocity. One potential approach may involve emphasizing feedback from visual cues that are more directly related to release velocity rather than focusing the shooter's attention on specific body movements.

Indexed as

Athletic PerformanceBasketballEye MovementsAdultHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41820236
PMCPMC13140917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.