Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41820227›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Phase-Pole-Free Images and Smooth Coil Sensitivity Maps by Regularized Nonlinear Inversion.

Moritz Blumenthal, Martin Uecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Simultaneous TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moritz BlumenthalInstitute of Biomedical Imaging, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2127-8365
Martin UeckerInstitute of Biomedical Imaging, Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8850-809X

Funding

Interoperable Software Platform for Reproducible Research and Clinical Translation of MRIU24EB029240 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LUSTIG, MICHAEL, UECKER, MARTIN · 2019 to 2023
$1.6M
Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/F100800Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 432680300-SFB 1456Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung 81Z0300115NIH HHS U24EB029240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePhase singularities are a common problem in image reconstruction with auto-calibrated sensitivities due to an inherent ambiguity of the estimation problem. The purpose of this work is to develop a method for detecting and correcting phase poles in non-linear inverse (NLINV) reconstruction of MR images and coil sensitivity maps.

methodsPhase poles are detected in individual coil sensitivity maps by computing the curl in each pixel. A weighted average of the curl in each coil is computed to detect phase poles. Phase pole detection and correction is then integrated into the iteratively regularized Gauss-Newton method of the NLINV algorithm. In addition, we demonstrate the algorithm can also remove phase poles in ESPIRiT coil sensitivity maps. Phase pole correction is evaluated for reconstruction of accelerated Cartesian MPRAGE data of the brain and interactive radial real-time MRI of the human heart.

resultsFor both applications, phase pole correction can be used for estimation of coil sensitivity profiles free from singularities. For NLINV, we demonstrate reliable and efficient estimation even from very small (

conclusionWith the proposed method, phase poles can be reliably removed in reconstructions and coil sensitivities.

Indexed as

HeartImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsBrainHumansImage EnhancementNonlinear DynamicsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityimage reconstructionMRInon‐linear inverse problemsparallel imagingphase singularity

Identifiers

PMID41820227
PMCPMC13156459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.