ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Dynamic Borrowing With a Bias-Tolerance Cap in Augmented Randomized Controlled Trials.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evaluating the efficacy and safety of treatments, they are challenged by cost, duration, enrollment, or ethical concerns. A possible solution is to incorporate external control data as a hybrid control group, for which various statistical methods are available. However, only a few of them account for confounding bias due to unknown/unmeasured covariates between the internal and external control data. Moreover, the amount of this potential bias cannot be measured using most existing methods without extensive simulations. Here, we propose a novel method for estimating the confounding effects of unmeasured covariates based on model-based regression standardization, inverse probability weighting, and augmented inverse probability weighting for continuous or binary outcomes. We also propose an estimator that dynamically borrows external data and uses a weighted mean, adjusting weights according to the estimated confounding effect of unmeasured covariates. In the proposed method, the expected amount of bias can be controlled within a prespecified "bias-tolerance cap," which may facilitate a better discussion among stakeholders about whether an effect estimate has unacceptable bias by utilizing external control data in a planning phase. Simulations showed that the proposed method regulates bias within the tolerance cap, regardless of the magnitude of confounding by unmeasured covariates, while greatly improving power and efficiency when confounding is absent. Finally, we illustrate an applicational example of our proposed method to an actual RCT and the external control datasets for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.