ArticleJournal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation2026
Automated Creak Detection in Spanish Speakers with and without AdLD.
Article in Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Creak Derived from CAPE-V Sentences in Patients with AdLd and pMTD.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAdductor laryngeal dystonia (AdLD) is a neurological voice disorder characterized by involuntary spasms of the adductor laryngeal muscles during phonation. An automated creak detector has shown promise in differentiating English speakers with AdLD from controls. However, no study has yet investigated creak in AdLD in Spanish speakers. In fact, there is a paucity of research validating tools to identify laryngeal dystonia (LD) in languages other than English. The purpose of this study was to determine whether creak differentiates Spanish-speaking individuals with and without AdLD.
methodsTwenty speakers with AdLD, twenty speakers without voice disorders (controls), and twenty speakers with glottic insufficiency were recorded in a clinical environment. Each participant read a set of recently developed Spanish stimuli designed for LD screening, containing voiced and voiceless loaded sentences. An open-source creak detector was used to calculate the percentage of creak in each speaker's recording. Mean smoothed cepstral peak prominence (CPPS) per speaker was calculated in Praat.
resultsA Pearson's correlation revealed a moderate relationship between creak and CPPS across groups (r = -0.56). An analysis of covariance revealed a statistically significant effect of creak between groups (F(3, 56) = 13.52, P > 0.05, R
conclusionsCreak differentiated Spanish speakers with and without AdLD with moderate discrimination. Although creak and CPPS were moderately correlated, when controlling for CPPS, creak was statistically different between speakers with AdLD and speakers with glottic insufficiency, and between speakers with AdLD and controls. Further work is needed to determine the clinical utility of creak in aiding a differential diagnosis of AdLD and muscle tension dysphonia in Spanish-speaking individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.