ArticleInternational journal of cosmetic science2026
Rational determination of real-life UV exposure across latitudes: An extended Diffey-based model integrating behavioural factors.
Article in International journal of cosmetic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn this study, we quantify both the UVB and UVA doses emitted by the sun at ground level and the realistic effective UVB and UVA doses received (ERD) by an individual across latitudes from 0° to 60° North and for every month of the year. These outputs provide a quantitative basis to derive protection indices and to support informed discussion on photoprotection. Our aim is not to prescribe SPF guidance for consumers or dermatologists, but to offer a robust scientific framework that clarifies how real-life exposure, behavioural factors, effective UVB and UVA-weighted doses and solar geometry collectively shape the necessary UV protection.
methodsDaily UV doses were computed for the 21st day of each month to capture seasonal extremes. These doses, expressed as Standard Erythemal Doses (UVB) and UVA-weighted doses, were calculated for each latitude based on Diffey's spectral irradiance framework. Two corrective factors were applied: (i) effective outdoor exposure time and (ii) body orientation. These adjustments allowed conversion of ambient daily doses into effective UVB and UVA-received doses (ERD). Finally, a third factor, representing realistic sunscreen application density (0.8 mg/cm
resultsAcross all latitudes and seasons, UV-weighted doses requirements follow predictable patterns driven by solar geometry. At most temperate latitudes, daily SED values range from approximately 5 to 60, while extreme values of 65-70 SED occur in tropical regions (10-30° N). The greatest differences between latitudes arise from seasonality. UVA-PF requirements exhibit similar constraints. When converted into effective received dose and then expressed in SPF terms, values above 60 provide minimal additional UVB benefit under realistic conditions.
conclusionsBy converting ambient irradiance into effective received dose, this model provides a realistic framework for daily UV exposure. It complements Diffey's approach rather than replacing it, supports rational discussion on SPF and UVA-PF adequacy without prescribing individual recommendations and offers a quantitative basis for realistic product design, regulatory discussion and consumer guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.