ArticleeNeuro2026
Aperiodicity in Mouse CA1 and DG Power Spectra.
Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rodent hippocampal power spectra comprise periodic and aperiodic components. The periodic components (brain rhythms) contain information about the behavioral or cognitive state of the animal. The aperiodic components are rarely studied, and their functionality is not well understood, though they have shown to be correlated with animal's age or the excitation-inhibition ratio of the brain region. To study these components in the mouse hippocampus, we modified the existing open-source FOOOF toolbox, which was originally optimized for EEG data. First, using simulated data, we show that our modifications decrease the error in assessment of the low frequency periodic components from 3 to 0.1%. Second, using tetrode electrophysiological signals from adult males, we compare the aperiodic activity within mice hippocampal subregions, CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG). Our optimization of FOOOF improved the aperiodic assessment errors by ∼50% and were critical in making the first assessment of the aperiodic components in these brain regions. Our results show significantly larger aperiodic exponents and knee frequencies in the DG than in CA1, which have been proposed to correlate with lower excitation and shorter timescales. Our work highlights the subtle differences in electrophysiology field potentials between hippocampal subregions and presents the improvements needed in the existing open-source toolbox to be able to see such differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.