ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2026
Randomised trial of early rapid saline bolus versus epinephrine during resuscitation in perinatal haemorrhagic cardiac arrest in newborn lambs.
Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the impact of early rapid saline bolus during resuscitation on (1) time to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), and (2) systemic haemodynamics, oxygenation, myocardial stress markers and pulmonary oedema.
designRandomised controlled trial.
settingLamb delivery suite. SUBJECTS: Term lambs in haemorrhagic, asphyxial cardiac arrest.
interventionsFetal lambs were exsanguinated (~45 mL/kg) followed by umbilical cord occlusion to arrest. After 5 min of asystole, ventilation was followed by coordinated chest compressions. Asystolic lambs were randomised to epi-first (intravenous epinephrine, 0.02 mg/kg and if no ROSC, a 10 mL/kg saline bolus over 5 min), or bolus-first (10 mL/kg saline bolus over 2 min and if no ROSC, followed by intravenous epinephrine). Haemodynamics and blood gases were monitored.
resultsIn the epi-first group, none of the lambs achieved ROSC after epinephrine; ROSC occurred in 11/11 lambs during or immediately after saline bolus. In the bolus-first group, none of the lambs achieved ROSC with bolus alone and 8/9 lambs had ROSC after epinephrine. Mean time to ROSC from start of resuscitation was shorter in epi-first (4.9±1.3 vs 6.6±0.9 min, p=0.004), but time to ROSC from the time of epinephrine administration was shorter with bolus-first (86±43 vs 40±21 s, p=0.004). The fetal heart rate did not change significantly despite fetal blood loss.
conclusionsOur findings support current neonatal resuscitation guidelines of intravenous epinephrine followed by a bolus in neonates with suspected hypovolaemic arrest. Early saline bolus delays epinephrine and ROSC. Careful clinical assessment of haemodynamics in the post-resuscitation phase is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.