ReviewESMO open2026
Refining the role of selinexor in multiple myeloma: strategic use in a shifting treatment landscape.
Review in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment landscape of multiple myeloma (MM) has been revolutionized over the past two decades, leading to unprecedented deep and durable responses, prolonged survival, and improved quality of life. Nonetheless, MM is still an incurable disease, and many patients, especially those with high-risk cytogenetics, renal impairment, or early drug resistance, continue to face poor outcomes. Selinexor, the first-in-class, orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), has shown encouraging results in combination with other agents, and selinexor-based therapy has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM, with selinexor-bortezomib-dexamethasone approved for patients with at least one prior line of therapy and selinexor-dexamethasone approved in the later-relapse setting. Notably, selinexor-based combinations have demonstrated consistent efficacy across different subgroups of patients, including those with triple-class refractory disease, renal dysfunction, high-risk cytogenetics, and prior anti-CD38 therapy. We herein provide an overview of selinexor, by describing its mechanism of action, potential interaction with other classes of drugs, novel combinations under investigation, and its role in treatment sequencing, by discussing latest results and potential strategies to mitigate toxicities, increase efficacy, and implement treatment adherence in MM. Overall, selinexor continues to represent a valuable option, especially for patients who are ineligible to receive T-cell-redirecting therapies, or difficult-to-treat patient subgroups, where alternative strategies remain limited. Meanwhile, further data on the use of selinexor-based combinations in different settings are eagerly awaited, to help clarify its role and address persistent unmet clinical needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.