ArticleBMJ open2026
Dilemma of self-management among patients with diabetes in primary care settings in China: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis qualitative study aimed to explore the self-management dilemmas faced by patients with diabetes in Chinese primary care and collect suggestions for improvement.
designQualitative methods are used in this study. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcripts.
settingFour primary care communities in Beijing. The interviews were conducted between April and August 2025.
participantsThis qualitative study used face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with 32 patients with type 2 diabetes. Data collection continued until information saturation was reached.
resultsFour core themes and multiple subthemes were identified. The first theme, 'Inadequate Disease Cognition and Health Literacy', showed that patients had a limited understanding of diabetes, often delaying diagnosis and only learning about complications after they appeared. Misconceptions about diet and a lack of medication management knowledge were also common. The second theme, 'Suboptimal Daily Management', highlighted that physical activity was unstructured, glucose monitoring was irregular and emergency response capabilities were poor. The third theme, 'Fragmented Healthcare Resources and Inadequate Family Support', revealed systemic barriers such as limited primary care competencies, homogeneous health education formats that failed to meet patients' needs and insufficient family support. The fourth theme, 'Limitations in Self-Management Decision-Making', demonstrated that patients' decision-making processes were predominantly experience-driven, relying on personal or communal anecdotes rather than scientific medical evidence.
conclusionsThe self-management challenges among Chinese patients with diabetes in primary care are a complex interplay of inadequate individual cognition, suboptimal daily practices and fragmented support systems. The study suggests that future interventions should focus on enhancing general practitioner training, developing culturally sensitive health education and rebuilding family and community support networks to sustainably resolve these management dilemmas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.