Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41819546›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2026

Complement system in cancer: friend or foe of immunotherapy.

Harendra Kumar Shah, Sai Prem, Xiaobo Wu, M Kathryn Liszewski, John P Atkinson, Abhay Kumar Singh, Vaishali Kapoor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Harendra Kumar ShahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sai PremDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5236-6132
Xiaobo WuDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
M Kathryn LiszewskiDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
John P AtkinsonDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Abhay Kumar SinghDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8399-7974
Vaishali KapoorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA vkapoor@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7581-1487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The complement system, a key component of the immune response, plays a dual role in cancer, influencing both tumor suppression and progression. Its three activation pathways (classical, alternative, and lectin) initiate immune processes, including opsonization and cell lysis. Within the tumor microenvironment, however, complement activation can paradoxically support immune-mediated tumor control or contribute to immune evasion and tumor growth. Therapeutic interventions such as radiation and certain chemotherapies can trigger complement activation by inducing immunogenic cell death and the release of damage-associated molecular patterns. This activation leads to the generation of anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, which recruit immune cells to the tumor site and promote antitumor immunity. However, these same fragments may also foster an immunosuppressive microenvironment by attracting regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, thereby limiting the efficacy of immunotherapies. Additionally, tumor cells often upregulate membrane complement regulatory proteins, including CD46, CD55, and CD59, to escape complement-mediated cytotoxicity and immune surveillance. Recent insights indicate that the complement system is a critical barrier to effective immunotherapy. Complement inhibition, particularly by targeting C3a receptor and C5a receptor 1, has been shown to synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors (eg, anti-programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1), reversing complement-driven immunosuppression and enhancing T cell-mediated tumor rejection. Combining complement blockade with proimmunogenic therapies such as radiation or chemotherapy may further amplify these effects by uncoupling therapy-induced complement activation from its immunosuppressive consequences. Thus, the interplay between complement activation and cancer therapeutics presents a promising avenue for treatment innovations. Strategic modulation of complement, whether through genetic, pharmacologic, or antibody-based approaches, could sensitize tumors to immunotherapy and help overcome resistance mechanisms. Continued investigation into this crosstalk will be essential for designing effective combination strategies that maximize antitumor immunity while minimizing immune escape.

Indexed as

Complement System ProteinsImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAnimalsComplement ActivationHumansTumor MicroenvironmentComplement System ProteinsComplementImmune modulatoryImmunotherapyRadiotherapy/radioimmunotherapyTumor microenvironment - TME

Identifiers

PMID41819546
PMCPMC12983960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.