Trial reportThe European respiratory journal2026
Safety and efficacy of namilumab for the treatment of chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis (RESOLVE-Lung): a randomised, double-blinded, multicentre, phase 2 study.
Trial report in The European respiratory journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonsteroid treatment options in (pulmonary) sarcoidosis. When to consider and why?Current opinion in pulmonary medicine · 2026Review
- New Therapies for Sarcoidosis: Molecular and Pathophysiological Basis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment options for chronic pulmonary sarcoidosis are limited in efficacy and by tolerability concerns. Namilumab, an investigational humanised monoclonal antibody inhibiting granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, was hypothesised to downregulate the granulomatous response in pulmonary sarcoidosis.
methodsRESOLVE-Lung was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in participants with chronic active pulmonary sarcoidosis on oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or immunosuppressive therapies (IST). Participants were randomised (1:1) to receive 150 mg namilumab or placebo
resultsOf 209 participants screened, 107 were randomised to receive namilumab (n=53) or placebo (n=54). The proportion of participants with a rescue event was higher for the namilumab group (37.5%) compared with the placebo group (23.5%) (stratified difference 13.6 (90% CI -1.5-28.7) percentage points; p=0.12). The least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in forced vital capacity % predicted was -3.3 (90% CI -5.1- -1.5) percentage points for namilumab and -2.9 (90% CI -4.5- -1.3) percentage points for placebo (LS mean difference -0.4 (90% CI -2.7-2.0) percentage points). The proportion of participants successfully achieving OCS taper was 53.3% for namilumab and 76.9% for placebo (difference -19.4 (90% CI -47.5-8.7) percentage points). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 94% in both groups, most being mild or moderate in severity.
conclusionIn participants with chronic active pulmonary sarcoidosis, namilumab did not provide clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.