ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2026
A hybrid AHP and K-means model for biopsychosocial surgical prioritization: validation in a high-complexity ENT unit.
Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo address the critical challenge of efficiently and ethically managing surgical waiting lists in digital health systems by developing a decision support framework based on biopsychosocial prioritization.
methodsThe authors integrate the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with K-Means clustering to create a hybrid decision support model that prioritizes patients using multidimensional biopsychosocial variables. The model was applied in the otolaryngology (ENT) unit of a high-complexity public hospital in Chile. Expert-informed weightings guided the AHP process, while K-Means clustering enabled data-driven segmentation into clinically coherent patient groups.
resultsThe proposed methodology significantly outperformed traditional chronological scheduling approaches. Specifically, it achieved a 27 % reduction in mean clinical risk, a 41 % decrease in urgent hospitalizations, a 32 % reduction in urgent bed days, and more than 12-days of acceleration in access for high-priority patients. CONTRIBUTION: While the AHP-clustering hybrid is established in prior literature, our contribution lies in operationalizing it with ethical safeguards and real-world validation within a high complexity ENT unit.
conclusionOur hybrid AHP and K-Means approach offers a transparent, scalable, and interpretable decision support tool for surgical prioritization. It aligns with the goals of digital health transformation by improving the fairness, efficiency, and responsiveness of healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.