ArticleATS scholar2026
Assessment of critical care education in the context of a Tele-ICU implementation.
Article in ATS scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere's a gap in understanding how healthcare workers perceive professional development activities and goals, specifically within a Tele-ICU environment. Gaining this knowledge is crucial for optimizing educational strategies and fostering professional engagement in this specialized setting.
objectiveThis study aimed to describe the implementation of educational activities for a multidisciplinary team directly involved in patient care, as a component of the Tele-ICU project named TeleUTI Conectada.
methodThis is a prospective study conducted within the TeleUTI Conectada project, involving 8 Brazilian ICUs. The educational component was delivered through 3 distinct methodologies: in-person simulation, asynchronous, and synchronous online classes. The Net Promoter Score (NPS) and additional questionnaires to assess professionals' self-perceived knowledge were applied. The participants' performance was assessed by comparing the initial and final scores of the asynchronous classes. Variables were summarized using median (IQR) or frequency (%). The Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was used to compare the differences between the initial and final scores of the asynchronous classes and the differences between professional performance. A P-value <.05 was considered significant for all analyses.
resultsBetween December 2023 and October 2024, 285 professionals were recruited to participate in educational activities. The majority of participants were female (202/285, 71%), with a median age of 36 years (31, 43). Nurses comprised the largest group of participants (161/285, 56.5%). Across all learning strategies, the course was highly rated, as indicated by the NPS and corroborated by the additional self-perception questions. The asynchronous course exhibited lower scores on both NPS and additional questionnaires, though without a statistically significant difference observed among professional groups. Participants expressed positive perceptions of the courses having met their expectations, enhanced their knowledge, and the content being applicable to their clinical practice. The median test scores comparing the initial and final scores of the asynchronous classes showed significant improvement within the respiratory therapist and nursing team.
conclusionThis study described the implementation of a multidisciplinary education program within the TeleUTI Conectada project. It may offer a viable model for essential critical care training in remote areas with limited access to specialized healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.