ArticleHuman molecular genetics2026
Subtle cellular phenotypes inform pathological and benign genetic mutants in the Iduronate-2 sulfatase gene.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Molecular genetic testing is increasingly used in clinical care to identify genetic variants and their impact on disease burden. However, variants of uncertain significance (VUS) hamper the utility of molecular diagnostic testing. In patients presenting with Hunter Syndrome and VUS in the IDS gene, clinical testing for iduronate-2-sulfatase enzyme activity has been the mainstay to determine whether a variant is likely damaging. However, enzyme assays alone fail to predict disease severity. In this study, we developed an image-based cellular assay using genome-engineered cells with IDS variants to determine whether a specific variant causes morphological changes that are associated with disease. Specifically, we generated twelve mutant cell lines and documented both IDS biochemical activity and reproducible phenotypic differences therein. Next, we examined patient-derived cell lines and found the same phenotypic differences compared to parental controls. The morphological changes were complex, but measured on a single scale, which we termed PathScoreLC. To determine whether the observed changes are specific to IDS, we reintroduced a recombinant human IDS enzyme (rhIDS) to rescue both the biochemical and phenotypic changes of these cells. We found a partial rescue in the presence of corrective levels of IDS enzyme. Finally, we examined the differences in gene expression and found that a recombinant enzyme was not sufficient to fully restore transcriptional changes in the mutant lines at the time points studied. This proof-of-concept study establishes preliminary validation of the method and sets the stage for future functional studies and broader IDS variant testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.