ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2026
Smartphone-Based Interpretable Machine Learning for Classifying Single-Leg Squat Performance Using Trunk, Pelvic, and Knee Kinematics: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Single-leg squat (SLS) performance is widely used to screen functional movement quality, but practical assessment often relies on expert visual grading or laboratory-based motion capture. In addition, conventional SLS criteria mainly focus on isolated joint deviations and may overlook coordination-related, multisegment movement patterns that characterize impaired performance. Objective: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of an interpretable machine learning framework for classifying SLS performance into 3 levels (good, moderate, and poor) from single-smartphone, frontal-view videos based on trunk, pelvic, and knee kinematics, and to evaluate coordination-informed features and model explainability using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME). Methods: A dataset of frontal-view SLS videos was labeled by physiotherapists into 3 functional categories (good, moderate, and poor). Videos were processed using 2D pose estimation, and models were trained on 17 engineered kinematic features derived from trunk, pelvic, and knee angles. Following the feature selection, 7 classifiers were trained and evaluated using the 8 selected features with stratified 5-fold cross-validation and a held-out test set. SHAP and LIME were applied for global and local interpretability. Results: On the held-out test set, adaptive boosting classified SLS performance with an accuracy of 0.84, an F1-score of 0.85, and an area under curve of 0.92. SHAP indicated that the summated angle (trunk + pelvis + knee), coordination-related features (knee × trunk interaction and knee-to-trunk ratio), and knee angle were key contributors to model predictions. LIME provided instance-level explanations that helped interpret individual classifications and decision boundaries. Conclusions: This study presents an interpretable machine learning framework for classifying SLS performance into 3 levels using frontal-view videos acquired with a single smartphone. By leveraging coordination-informed engineered features and explainable artificial intelligence, the framework enables transparent interpretation of movement performance beyond isolated joint deviations. The proposed workflow uses smartphones for standardized video acquisition, while performance screening is achieved through machine learning. Given its lightweight feature design, this framework has potential for future implementation on modern smartphones and may support rehabilitation planning and injury-prevention strategies in sports and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.