ArticlePloS one2026
An Fc-silent OspA monoclonal antibody passively protects mice from tick and intradermal Borrelia burgdorferi challenge.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protective efficacy of mutant strains ofInfection and immunity · 2026Article
- OspA antibodies inhibit theInfection and immunity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The monoclonal antibody, LA-2, has played a pivotal role in the development of Outer surface protein A (OspA)-based vaccines for Lyme disease, a multisystem illness caused by the tick-borne spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Of particular significance was the demonstration more than three decades ago that LA-2 equivalent antibody titers, defined by a competitive-inhibition ELISA, serve as a reliable correlate of vaccine-induced protection across different species, including humans. In vitro characterization of LA-2 has identified both complement-dependent and -independent activities, although which of these attributes contribute to protection against B. burgdorferi remains unresolved. To address this issue, we generated and characterized an "Fc-silent" version of LA-2 IgG1 carrying so-called LALAPG substitutions (L234A, L235A, P329G). We demonstrate that LA-2 LALAPG retained OspA binding activity but was severely attenuated in in vitro complement deposition and complement-dependent borreliacidal assays. Nonetheless, LA-2 LALAPG was as effective as LA-2 at passively protecting C3H mice against nymphal tick-mediated B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (s.s.) B31 challenge. LA-2 LALAPG was also equivalent to LA-2 in passively protecting BALB/c mice against intradermal B. burgdorferi s.s. B31 challenge. In the intradermal challenge model, viable spirochetes were not recoverable 24 h after injection from skin biopsies of mice treated with LA-2 or LA-2 LALAPG, and an influx of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to the injection site was abrogated. Collectively, these results suggest that LA-2's primary mode of action involves direct physical interactions with the spirochete rather than complement-dependent killing. Elucidating these mechanisms may have implications for understanding the mechanistic correlates of OspA-based vaccine-induced immunity in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.