ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Female community health volunteers' knowledge and confidence in providing community-based diabetes self-management support in Nepal: A biphasic mixed method evaluation.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-management support by community health workers, referred to as Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) in Nepal, can enhance diabetes care in resource-constrained settings. We assessed FCHVs' knowledge, perceived self-efficacy, and barriers to supporting diabetes self-management before and after training. Guided by the Health Belief Model, we conducted a biphasic, Qual + quan, concurrent, embedded mixed-methods evaluations among 28 FCHVs in four wards in rural mid-Western Nepal. We evaluated the program into two phases, each consisting of focus group discussions (FGDs); trainings that included didactics, hands-on-practice, and role play demonstrations; and pre- and post-training surveys. Phase 2 occurred nine months after Phase 1. We conducted trainings and evaluations over 4-5 hours/ward/phase. FGD data were analyzed using both deductive and inductive coding and emerging themes were then examined for patterns and relationships among the codes. We summarized quantitative data using descriptive statistics and integrated with qualitative data during interpretation. FCHVs' mean age was 48 years, 32.1% had completed secondary education, and 75% had served as FCHVs for >10 years. We identified five themes in qualitative analysis: (1) diabetes knowledge, (2) diet and lifestyle counseling, (3) FCHV's confidence, (4) training and education, and (5) barriers and motivators for community-based self-management support. Mixed-methods evaluations showed knowledge of diabetes and confidence in self-management skills improved after the training. Although barriers, such as inadequate incentives, persisted in Phase 2, communities' trust in FCHV as diabetes self-management supporter improved. These findings suggest that FCHVs may be willing to take a greater role in diabetes self-management support, and that even short training sessions have the potential to enhance their confidence and knowledge, particularly if our findings are further substantiated. Ensuring appropriate incentives, ongoing training and system-level support are important for sustainability of such programs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.