ArticlePloS one2026
Exploring the aesthetic cognition and artistic acceptance of AIGC-generated urban sculptures: A structural equation modeling and visual content analysis approach.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC) becomes increasingly integrated into creative practices, its application in public art-particularly in urban sculpture-raises fundamental questions regarding aesthetic cognition, emotional engagement, and artistic acceptance. This study proposes and empirically tests a conceptual model to explain how general audiences perceive and evaluate AIGC-generated urban sculptures. Drawing upon Leder et al.'s aesthetic appreciation framework and theories of human-AI trust, we develop a structural equation model (SEM) comprising seven latent constructs: visual aesthetic features, cognitive mastery, emotional arousal, perceived artistic value, trust in AIGC, artistic acceptance intention, and familiarity control. A total of 24 AI-generated sculpture stimuli were produced using Midjourney v6 and evaluated along five aesthetic dimensions through expert visual content analysis. Questionnaire data were collected from 326 respondents across sculpture parks, art plazas, and university campuses in China. SEM results reveal that both cognitive mastery and emotional arousal significantly mediate the relationship between aesthetic features and perceived artistic value. Moreover, trust in AIGC and perceived artistic value jointly predict acceptance intentions, highlighting the intertwined roles of perceptual, affective, and attitudinal factors in the legitimation of AI-generated art. This research extends classical aesthetic theory to non-human creative contexts and provides practical implications for the design, deployment, and public communication of algorithmically generated urban artworks. By demonstrating that audiences can cognitively and emotionally resonate with AI-generated sculptures-contingent on visual coherence, symbolic richness, and technological trust-this study offers a novel empirical foundation for future investigations into the cultural and spatial integration of artificial creativity. However, the ecological validity of the study is inherently limited, as the stimuli consisted of digital renderings rather than physical public sculptures. Therefore, the findings represent preliminary insights into audience responses to conceptual AIGC artworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.