SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
A systematic review of dengue controlled human infection studies: safety, viral kinetics and immunology.
Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe immunopathogenesis of dengue infection and immune correlates of protection are uncertain, no therapeutic anti-viral is available, and the long-term risks of severe breakthrough infection after vaccination remain of concern. Dengue controlled human infection models (DCHIM) have found increasing utility and have the potential to address these unmet needs. We reviewed the clinical, biochemical and immunologic features of modern day DCHIMs.
methodsA systematic review protocol was developed and registered with PROSPERO [CRD42024558534]. We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase for controlled human infection studies using attenuated dengue virus strains from January 2000 - December 2025. No restriction was placed on study setting (dengue endemic/non-endemic) or whether the study was conducted in seronegative or seropositive individuals. The primary outcome was the proportion of inoculated participants who developed viraemia ('attack rate').
resultsOur search yielded 1181 results, and identified 11 published studies, recruiting 248 participants aged 18-55 years. All studies were performed in non-dengue endemic areas and were models of primary dengue. Four studies challenged previously vaccinated individuals, and one utilised DCHIM to assess antiviral efficacy. Attenuated dengue virus strains of all four DENV 1-4 serotypes were utilised as challenge agents. Attack rate across all serotypes was 50-100% in seronegative participants and 0-83% in previously vaccinated participants and was strain-dependent. Clinical and biochemical features of dengue fever varied between strains, with peak viral load and probability of fever being highly correlated (r = 0·91, p < 0·01). There were no serious adverse event reported, and 9 (4%) participants met protocol criteria for hospitalisation. Viral and/or immune evidence of disease enhancement was observed in 5/81 (7%) of challenged seropositive participants.
conclusionDCHIMs of primary dengue are a valuable and safe tool that has supported vaccine development. Further work is needed to expand DCHIMs to endemic settings and as a model of secondary dengue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.