Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41818260›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Impact of sugar-based baits on midgut microbiome composition in Aedes mosquitoes: Implications for vector control.

Ranjitha Sambanthan, Nur Faeza Abu Kassim, Sara A Abuelmaali, Wan Maryam Wan Ahmad Kamil, Sumiyyah Sabar, Kamarul Zaman Zarkasi, Wan Rosli Wan Ishak, Cameron E Webb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ranjitha Sambanthan129 Medical Entomology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
Nur Faeza Abu Kassim129 Medical Entomology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6620-8603
Sara A Abuelmaali129 Medical Entomology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4327-5130
Wan Maryam Wan Ahmad KamilSchool of Physics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
Sumiyyah SabarChemical Sciences Programme, School of Distance Education (SDE), Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8925-5610
Kamarul Zaman Zarkasi129 Medical Entomology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Minden, Penang, Malaysia.
Wan Rosli Wan IshakSchool of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7650-0499
Cameron E WebbMedical Entomology, NSW Health Pathology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Aedes mosquitoes are responsible for the transmission of many severe diseases. Novel integrated vector management techniques like alginate hydrogel beads and appealing toxic sugar bait have strengthened control efforts. These techniques help to control mosquitoes by taking advantage of their attraction to sugar. Different types of sugar that mosquitoes ingest during feeding can affect the makeup of the microbiome in the midgut. The mosquito midgut microbiome maintains immune priming and baseline immune activity. Therefore, the current focus of this study is on utilizing microbial communities for vector control measures with a particular emphasis on how they consume various forms of sugars. Both wild and lab strains of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus mosquito samples were reared, and attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSBs) infused with Chrysanthemum, mango, mix and control solutions. Then, the impact of bacterial communities was assessed using 16S rRNA gene sequences. According to our findings, the majority of the bacterial species in mango and mixed treatments belonged to the Enterobacteriaceae family. A total of 24 different bacterial species were found in Aedes mosquitoes that fed on mango ATSBs. The isolates were found to be members of three phyla from Actinobacteria (4.16%), Firmicutes (54.17%), and Proteobacteria (41.67%). Data reveals that different species, strains, and diets affect the midgut bacterial diversity in the mosquitoes. In addition to strengthening our knowledge concerning the way this bacterium shapes the microbial community, a thorough investigation of the prevalence of the midgut bacterial community is essential for alerting present and future mosquito and disease control initiatives.

Indexed as

AedesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsSugarsActinobacteriaAnimalsBacillotaBacteriaMangiferaProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSugars

Identifiers

PMID41818260
PMCPMC12981432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.