Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41818247›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Interpretable crop pest and disease identification based on comparative concept tree.

Bingjing Jia, Zhiwei Zheng, Jinyu Zeng, Lei Shi, Hua Ge, Chenguang Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bingjing JiaAnhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7555-0723
Zhiwei ZhengAnhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, China.
Jinyu ZengAnhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, China.
Lei ShiState key Laboratory of Media Convergence and Communication; Communication University of China, Beijing, China.
Hua GeAnhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, China.
Chenguang SongAnhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning provides new methods for crop pest and disease identification and control, offering unique advantages in terms of recognition accuracy and efficiency. However, deep learning models generally lack interpretability, and their internal decision-making processes are difficult to understand. This, to some extent, undermines users' trust in the model's predictions and hinders its large-scale application in agricultural production. Therefore, improving model transparency and interpretability has become an important research direction. To address this issue, this study proposes a novel interpretable crop pest and disease identification model, the Contrastive Prototype Tree (CPTR). The model is designed around the core structure of "concept prototypes and decision tree," which builds clear prototype matching paths for each recognition result. This enables the model to not only have strong classification capability but also provide intuitive explanations. Additionally, the study introduces the SimCLR contrastive learning framework to enhance the model's ability to express deep image features. SimCLR guides the model to learn more discriminative visual features by maximizing the similarity between positive sample pairs and minimizing the similarity between negative sample pairs, thereby improving overall recognition performance. This study evaluated the model on three datasets: AppleLeaf9, Cassava, and Cashew. The experimental results show that CPTR achieves accuracies of 83.74%, 94.80%, and 96.01% on the three datasets, representing improvements of 4.12%, 0.34%, and 0.51% compared to Prototype Tree, respectively. These results indicate that the proposed model achieves the highest accuracy across different datasets, demonstrating its effectiveness.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalDeep LearningPlant DiseasesAnimalsClassification AlgorithmsDecision Trees

Identifiers

PMID41818247
PMCPMC12981449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.