Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41818245›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Deep-Fed: A comprehensive solution for precise bone fracture identification in athletes.

Tariq Ali, Asif Nawaz, Muhammad Rizwan Rashid Rana, Azhar Imran, Ahmad Alshammari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tariq AliUniversity Institute of Information Technology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4974-1569
Asif NawazUniversity Institute of Information Technology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Rizwan Rashid RanaDepartment of Robotics & Artificial Intelligence, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Institute of Science & Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Azhar ImranSchool of Software Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Ahmad AlshammariDepartment of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Northern Border University, Rafha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2051-2757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone fracture diagnosis is a critical aspect of sports medicine, where accurate and timely detection enables effective treatment and rapid recovery. This study proposes Deep-Fed, a federated deep learning framework for fracture diagnosis in athletes. Deep-Fed integrates convolutional neural networks with a specialized classification module, FractureNet, and trains it across distributed athletic clinics using federated averaging without exchanging raw images, thereby preserving patient privacy while leveraging diverse data sources. The framework was evaluated on three benchmark datasets-Deep-I, Deep-II, and Deep-III-representing varied imaging conditions and patient groups. Deep-Fed achieved accuracy rates of 96.23 ± 0.42%, 97.11 ± 0.35%, and 96.73 ± 0.39%, respectively, significantly outperforming Baseline 1 (87.23 ± 0.68%), Baseline 2 (90.15 ± 0.55%), and Baseline 3 (94.49 ± 0.47%). Statistical analysis using paired t-tests confirmed that Deep-Fed's improvements were significant (p < 0.05) across all comparisons. These results demonstrate that federated learning can be effectively applied for high-accuracy fracture detection in decentralized clinical settings, enabling collaboration across institutions without compromising data privacy.

Indexed as

AthletesDeep LearningFractures, BoneConvolutional Neural NetworksFederated LearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID41818245
PMCPMC12981491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.