ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Soft Selective Sweeps Predominate in the Yellow Fever Mosquito Aedes aegypti.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Aedes aegypti mosquito is a vector for human arboviruses and zoonotic diseases and therefore poses a serious threat to public health. Understanding how Ae. aegypti adapts to environmental pressures-such as insecticides-is critical for developing effective mitigation strategies. However, most traditional methods for detecting recent positive selection search for signatures of classic "hard" selective sweeps, and to date no studies have examined soft sweeps in Ae. aegypti. This is a significant limitation as this is vital information for understanding the pace of adaptation-populations that can immediately respond to new selective pressures are expected to adapt more often via standing variation or recurrent adaptive mutations (both of which may produce soft sweeps) than via de novo mutations (which produce hard sweeps). To this end, we used a machine learning method capable of detecting hard and soft sweeps to investigate positive selection in Ae. aegypti population samples from Africa and the Americas. Our results reveal that soft sweeps are significantly more common than hard sweeps, which may imply that this species can respond quickly to environmental stressors. This is a particularly concerning finding for vector control methods that aim to eradicate Ae. aegypti using insecticides. We highlight genes under selection that include both well-characterized and putatively novel insecticide resistance genes. These findings underscore the importance of using methods capable of detecting and distinguishing hard and soft sweeps, implicate soft sweeps as a major selective mode in Ae. aegypti, and highlight genes that may aid in the control of Ae. aegypti populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.